Это просто как 2х2.
Если группа стран решили междусобойчик устроить и договориться о льготных налогах, значит, например, американские товары будут облагаться меньшим налогом и будут дешевле. Значит будут продаваться лучше. Значит будет больше спрос на американские товары, значит будут больше рабочих мест.
Если же отказываться от этого, значит отказываться от льготного налогообложения. Откуда же появятся новые рабочие места?
Это значит, что вы не читаете материала по теме, в незнании которого обвиняете меня!:
While high-tech service industries are the glamour names in these discussions, it’s important to keep in mind that U.S. manufacturing firms, which stand to lose out as a result of the TPP, are responsible for more than two-thirds of U.S. business research and development spending (68.9 percent of total business R&D in 2012).
Special protections for investors in the proposed TPP will encourage the growth of outsourcing to TPP countries. In this regard, what’s important to remember is that 12 million jobs remain in U.S. manufacturing. It’s these jobs that are on the line in the next wave of outsourcing. The TPP will open up countries like Vietnam and Malaysia to more U.S. FDI and outsourcing. If China and India are allowed to join the deal in the future, the threat of additional outsourcing will increase exponentially.
The United States already has a large and growing trade deficit with the 11 other countries in the proposed TPP that reached $265.1 billion in 2014. In contrast, the United States had a small trade surplus with Mexico in 1993, before NAFTA took effect. Outsourcing to the TPP countries is a potentially much greater threat than it was under NAFTA with Mexico.
http://www.epi.org/blog/whats-wrong-wit ... americans/И куда приложить вашу логику?